We won't understand the archetypes if we reduce them
to vague generalities, or fixed notions. They are patterns of psychic force
that are constantly in motion and forever shapeshifting, something like the
major arcana of tarot. Jung himself - as opposed to some Jungians - insisted on
that last characteristic. "It [the archetype] persists throughout the ages
and requires interpreting anew. The archetypes are imperishable elements of the
unconscious, but they change their shape continually" [1]
Jung’s intellectual colleague, the physicist Wolfgang
Pauli, suggested in his monograph on Kepler that archetypes are “instincts of
imagination”.
He [Kepler] speaks in
fact of ideas that are preexistent in the mind of God and were implanted in the
soul, the image of God, at the time of creation. These primary images, which
the soul can perceive with the aid of an innate ‘instinct’, are called by
Kepler archetypal. Their agreement with the ‘primordial images’ or archetypes
introduced into modern psychology by C.G. Jung and functioning as ‘instincts of
imagination’ is very extensive.”[2].
Jung saw the play of the archetypes in synchronistic
events. Aniela Jaffé observed
that “one of the main points of Jung’s investigations on parapsychology is that
synchronistic events are manifestations of an archetype. In other words, the
archetype is their “organizer”.” [3]
Jung cautioned that the archetypes, unrecognized and
uncontained, have a raw, primal energy that can flood the narrow riverbed of
ordinary consciousness.
The primordial image, or archetype, is a figure be it a daemon, a human being, or a process - that constantly recurs in the course of history and appears wherever creative fantasy is freely expressed. Essentially, therefore, it is a mythological figure. When we examine these images more closely, we find that they give form to countless typical experiences of our ancestors. They are, so to speak the psychic residua of innumerable experiences of the same type… It is like a deeply graven river-bed in the psyche, in which the waters of life, instead of flowing along as before in a broad but shallow stream, suddenly swell into a mighty river. This happens whenever that particular set of circumstances is encountered which over long periods of time has helped to lay down the primordial image. [4]
Robert A. Johnson, in Inner Work,
counseled that “Each of us has all the great archetypal themes hidden inside.
We all have the seeds of the heroic quest within us; we must live it out
sometime, on some level. Each of us has the journey and labors of Psyche, the
encounter with Eros and Aphrodite, built somewhere into our inner structure.
One can’t avoid these leitmotivs; one must express and experience them.” [5]
The archetypes are neverending stories that, like all great stories, have countless variants. They may also be gods in disguise, cloaked in language that makes them half-decent to the modern mind. Jung lifted the hem of his own robe when he wrote in Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious that “Only an unparalleled impoverishment of symbolism could
enable us to rediscover the gods as psychic factors, that is, as archetypes of
the unconscious.” [6]
References
C. G. Jung, The Archetypes and the Collective
Unconscious, Collected Works volume 9, part 1 trans R.F,C, Hull, Princeton:
Princeton University Press, 1980) CW 9i, para 301).
2. C.A. Meier (ed) Atom and Archetype: The
Pauli-Jung Letters 1932-1958 trans. David Roscoe, (Princeton: Princeton
University Press, 208) 204
3. Aniela
Jaffé, Apparitions and Precognition (New Hyde Park,
NY: University Books, 1963) 192
4. C.G.Jung, "On the Relation of Analytical
Psychology to Poetry" (1922) in The Spirit in Man, Art and Literature (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978)
5. Robert A. Johnson, Inner Work Using Dreams and
Active Imagination for Personal Growth (New York: Harper & Row, 1989) 153
6. CW9.1 para 50
Art: "Eyebrows of Zeus" by Robert Moss
No comments:
Post a Comment